Research is a such thing that makes people excited, thrilled, experienced, knowledgeable and so on. Researcher do research and write books on those purpose to earn money,reputations and more. Most of the people think that only the researcher are the owner of all credits for doing their research and writing books, but there are some people who own most parts of the credits .They own credit because the sources of the research and writings are theirs, and the writers would not research and write their books without them. Several decades earlier there were not such consent issue for research and writing books to publish and even these days in some place this kind of consent does not work. However, taking consent for writings and research, in a research paper, article or in a story is very important and has many strong reasons.
First of all, when we read a books, we get somebodies information through writer's personal visits or indirect reference. Sometime those information are very sophisticate and belongs as personal information. As human being it's our rights to preserve our own personal information. Law is always against the writer and publisher, if they don't take consent from the source. From The book of " The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" Written by Rebecca Skloot, we have learned a lot of medical background of Henritta Lacks's and her family too . We have learned such information that people share only with the close people. Here writer took her safe position. She took the consent from Henritta's family. Otherwise as a reader nobody could support writer to for such job.
Secondly, All kind of books like research paper ,article,or story have value in money, and sometime more than money. For this reason, we can see a few pages of book is so costly depends what the book has. If the book is about a person or related to him or her then there no way to avoid the permission or consent. It would valueless for some people but not for all. In the " The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" we got that Henritta had died with cervical cancer and there was no treatment for that disease on that time. The researcher in Hopkin Hospital did research on Henritta without her permission with that disease. They found her immortal cells those are still a wonder in our modern medical science. A researcher George gay wrote a research paper with those cells and named it HeLa. There were a lot of organization who earned huge money with that research and reproducing HeLa cells, but the fact is that Henritta's family had suffered financially a lot. This is an example on Henritta Lacks. If there is no value of a person's consent, then no body would not come forward for any invention or research.
Finally, there are some countries where there are no law to preserve personal privacy.There are also some countries where they have laws for personal privacy, but the laws have no implication, and like this my country in one of them. In our country a lot of people are being abused. People are being used by the writers as a researcher, and columnist in news paper and so on.Even in such research people are dying.Such writers are earning huge money, and a lot of things happening with those information, but the people who are used don not no even which is more than unethical an unlawful.
Indeed, writers always do a great contribution for our life. Their jobs stay immortal and save uncountable lives. Most of the time they get credits for their job but we cannot deny the people who are used by them for research, article or a theory. We should respect him or her by giving support to them, there family or at least their memories. Therefor the law and implication is very essential on a consent for personal privacy. Writers obviously need to a consent form the people when writers need them for their purpose.